Solicited Proposal Peer Review

We’ve made it to our first peer review! The solicited proposal should be completed by early next week if possible.

For this peer review (and as a discussion post), I’d like you to do two things:

By Wednesday, please post your draft in whatever form it’s currently in. This might be the outline from last week, it might be complete proposal, it might be somewhere in between.

By Friday, please respond to the two peers above you in this discussion board. (First two posters: please pick any two peers, but maybe start at the bottom of the list when you’re ready to review?) Your response should address the following:

  • How complete does this proposal look? Be honest. Hopefully you and your peer agree on its level of done-ness.
    • If it’s not complete, which specific parts seem to be missing? (Again, you aren’t saying anything bad about their proposal. Your peer needs to know if it’s clear which parts still need to be worked on.)
  • Can you clearly identify the train of thought from start to finish? That is, do you understand the argument your peer is making for why they need this support?
  • Do your peer’s comments accurately identify the moves they are making?
  • Does the placeholder text, if any, clearly convey what that part of the document is supposed to do?
  • Finally, if your peer included their RFP information or requirements (one of the requirements of the final version you turn in to me), does it look like they are doing what the RFP asked them to do?
    • If not, what’s missing?

Grading

The grading for this peer review is very simple.

  • If your draft is posted by Wednesday, 2 points.
  • If you provide any feedback at all to your peer, 1 point.
  • If your feedback addresses all of the points above and is useful, 2 points.
    • Please don’t just leave it at “Great job!” Even when your peer does an awesome job, tell them what was great!

WRI 510: Syllabus

Instructor and Course Info

Matt Frye — matt.frye@oit.edu — 94I-5O4-I38O

Office Hours: Noon – 12:50pm Daily (All classes) // 3:00pm – 4:20pm T/R (see below)

WRI 510 focuses on the process of writing a proposal-style document, and it is geared specifically towards grant proposal writing and fundraising. Many of the discussions in this class are applicable for research project proposals, business proposals and crowd-funding campaigns. This course uses a combination of corpus linguistics, genre analysis and rhetorical analysis to create a set of disciplinary rules for crafting a proposal. By the end of the course, you are expected to create a proposal of your own that is appropriate for submission to its target audience—whether that be a major funding source like the National Science Foundation or a local interest group like a book club.

WRI 510 is an upper-level version of WRI 410, so both courses will follow a similar path all term. I’ll post lecture/overview videos each week, and I’ll ask you to engage with your peers via discussion boards. Our class time (3:00pm – 4:20pm, Tuesdays and Thursdays) will be set aside as a special set of office hours just for Grant Writing students. On Tuesday, we’ll do a general Q&A and discussion of readings and assignments. On Thursday, we’ll do a more practical look at how our readings work with real-life proposals. Attendance is not required for these sessions. As per OIT policy, these sessions will be recorded and posted to Canvas.

In the past, I added extra requirements in WRI 510 assignments to distinguish them from WRI 410. However, as this class is taken almost exclusively by Master’s in Allied Health students seeking support/funding for their capstone projects, those additional requirements did not necessarily lead to better projects, just additional workload on students.

Learning Outcomes and Objectives

By the end of this course, you are expected to be able to do the following:

  • Describe the genre conventions of RFPs (or similar documents) and proposals, both generally and within your discipline or career path
  • Locate RFPs (or similar documents) appropriate to your discipline and career path
  • Analyze the audience of your work using both RFP information and external research
  • Clearly explain the purpose of your work to your audience
  • Fully describe your audience and their needs/expectations
  • Make appropriate adjustments to documents to meet the needs of your audience
  • Use appropriate evidence/support to demonstrate your expertise to your audience
  • Generate and work within your own schedule to meet the needs of an external deadline
  • Assess and justify your own decisions in every document you create. (I can grade you for the next 10 weeks, but starting in week 11, you need to do that for yourself.)

Assignments and Grades

There are four major units in the course, each supported by a series of discussion boards. For ease of math, all assignments are entered into Canvas at their final gradebook value. If you ever want to know your current grade, just add up the total number of points you’ve received. (See Late Policy below.)

Unit 1: Getting to Know You (10%)

Annotated Resume or Biosketch: 10%

Unit 2: Solicited Proposal (35%)

Discussion 1: Move Identification: 5%

Discussion 2: Audience Analysis: 5%

Discussion 3: Move Planning: 5%

Annotated Proposal Draft: 15%

Peer Review: 2 @ 2.5% each

Unit 3: Unsolicited Proposal (35%)

Discussion 4: Audience Identification: 5%

Discussion 5: Core Appeals: 5%

Discussion 6: Buddy System: 5%

Annotated Proposal Draft: 15%

Peer Review: 2 @ 2.5% each

Unit 4: Finalized Proposal (20%)

Revised Resume or Biosketch: 5%

Annotated Proposal: 15%

Course Materials

All course materials will be made available online. I recommend using Microsoft Word (which you can get with your OIT login info at Office.com) or Open Office Writer (which you can get at OpenOffice.org). Please do not use Google Docs to create your documents for this class. Document formatting in grant proposals is very important, and Google Docs doesn’t offer a lot of power in that area.

Policies

Attendance

As noted above, I’ll be using our class time as a sort of focused office hours just for grant writing students. Tuesdays will be general Q&A, while Thursdays will include a practical walkthrough or use-case of our readings or assignments for that week.

Academic Honesty

According to OIT-14-030 (Student Academic Integrity policy): 

Academic dishonesty is defined as cheating, plagiarism or otherwise obtaining grades under false pretenses. Plagiarism is defined as submitting the language, ideas, thoughts or work of another as one’s own or assisting in the act of plagiarism by allowing one’s work to be used in this fashion. Cheating is defined as, but not limited to: obtaining or providing unauthorized information during an examination through verbal, visual or unauthorized use of books, notes, text and other materials; obtaining or providing unauthorized information concerning all or part of an examination prior to that examination; taking an examination for another student or arranging for another person to take an exam in one’s place; altering test answers after submittal for grading; changing grades after grades have been awarded; or altering other official academic records.

You will use materials created by other people and organizations to do your work. I expect you to incorporate the thoughts and language of others into your work, but we will also discuss the ways of documenting this appropriately. The important qualities to pay attention to are “appropriate” and “authorized.”

While attribution style will differ according to your discipline and career path, the rhetorical move of showing what conversations you are connected to is an absolute necessity. No professional works in isolation.

Intentional plagiarism or outright cheating will result in a zero on the task. Egregious or repeated offenses will result in a referral to the Student Hearing Commission.

Classroom Conduct

On discussion boards, you are expected to act like professional. Please contribute to discussions and activities, and do not purposefully harass, intimidate, insult, bully or otherwise diminish the experience of any of your peers.

In the age of social media, this also goes for conduct outside class, but I’m not grading that.

Email/Communication

No working relationship should be completely inflexible. Any policy in this syllabus or on any assignment is up for discussion, individually or class-wide. If life throws you a curveball and you need some wiggle room, let me know. If an assignment just isn’t working for the class, we can change it. I plan these classes long before the term starts, and something is bound to need adjustment as the quarter unfolds.

I do my best to return emails as quickly as possible, but I’m old and I keep old-people hours. Please give me 24 hours to get back to emails. If it’s more urgent than that, I welcome texts and calls to the phone number at the top of the syllabus (it’s my cell, so it should stay active if Skype for Business goes down).

Accommodation

If you have a disability that requires any additional accommodations to complete work this course, please let me know. Like all professors at OIT, I rely on the Disabilities Service Office in LRC 229 to help me with this process. If you feel that you may need some accommodation in your courses, please contact this office.

In an online setting, that requirement is particularly onerous. I’m happy to make any and all accommodations necessary to help you reach our course objectives.

If you do not have a disability but you think I could do a better job of accommodating your learning style, also let me know. Seriously. I do my best to ensure that my courses create as few hurdles as possible beyond their content. If I’m not succeeding there, I want to know.

Late Policy

In the world of grant writing, there is no late policy. Anything received after a deadline (even moments after a deadline) is typically unacceptable. This is just due to the nature of grant writing: any opportunity is going to be met with dozens, hundreds or even thousands of proposals. Any restriction that a funding group can place to filter out proposals is just a matter of workload control. Please use our planning assignments to your advantage to make sure that you stay on schedule!

… Now, that said, this is a college course. I hope you’re writing these proposals for a real purpose. However, I completely, totally, 100% understand that life is going to get in the way for all of us at some point this term. That’s just due to the nature of being in college: mine is just one of four or five courses you’re taking right now.

Discussion boards can be completed late, but your posts are only worth 1 point. Proposals can be completed late at no penalty. The only hard deadline is the end of the term, as I need to have grades in by the Monday after finals week.

WRI 510: Grant Proposal Writing

Welcome to Grant Proposal Writing! This page has the schedule and links to all of the resources you need for the course. All of this content is duplicated on Canvas.

Schedule

Week 1 (March 29 – April 2)

Videos

Readings

  • Biosketch Guide: LINK
  • Biosketch Template: LINK
  • Resume Guide: LINK
  • RFP Resources: LINK

Assignments and Due Dates

By the end of the week, please complete the Annotated Resume or Biosketch assignment. Also, drop by the Main Discussion board and introduce yourself!

Week 2 (April 5 – 9)

Videos and Readings

  • Weekly Overview video here: LINK
  • Connor and Upton Walkthrough here: LINK
  • Discussion Post Assignment Overview here: LINK

Ulla Connor and John Upton’s “The Genre of Grant Proposals,” from Discourse in the Professions: LINK

Assignments and Due Dates

We are officially starting the Solicited Proposal project this week. It is due on May 2.

By Wednesday, complete step 1 of Discussion 1. By Friday, complete step 2.

Week 3 (April 12 – 16)

Videos and Readings

  • Weekly Overview video here: LINK
  • Weekly Discussion Board video here: LINK
  • Solicited Proposal video here: LINK

Module 15 of Lumen Learning’s Technical Writing: LINK to table of contents, or individual readings linked below.

Assignments and Due Dates

By Wednesday, complete step 1 of Discussion 2. By Friday, complete step 2.

Week 4 (April 19 – 23)

Videos and Readings

  • Week 4 Overview: LINK
  • Discussion 3 Overview: LINK
  • Readings Overview: LINK
  • Word Techniques for Page Design: LINK

Videos this week: The overview, the discussion board explanation, the readings explanation and a Word Processor Techniques video to go with our readings. I recorded them Sunday afternoon, but the sunlight makes them difficult to watch (which is a nice way of saying I’ve spent far too much time indoors the last few months). They’ll be re-done and posted by noon on Monday.

Module 3 of Lumen Learning’s Technical Writing: LINK to table of contents, or individual readings linked below.

Assignments and Due Dates

By Wednesday, complete step 1 of Discussion 3. By Friday, complete step 2.

Week 5 (April 26 – 30)

Videos and Readings

Overview video for this week: LINK

No additional reading.

Assignments and Due Dates

By Wednesday, please post a rough draft of your Solicited Proposal to the Solicited Proposal Peer Review discussion board. By Friday, please review two peers (the person who posted above you and the person who posted below you).

By Sunday, please submit your Solicited Proposal to the assignment page on Canvas.

Week 6 (May 3 – 7)

Videos and Readings

  • Overview video: LINK
  • Connor and Gladkov video: LINK
  • Discussion video: LINK
  • Unsolicited Proposal: LINK
  • What do we do about last week? LINK

Ulla Connor and Kostya Gladkov’s “Rhetorical Appeals in Fundraising Direct Mail Letters,” from Discourse in the Professions: LINK

Assignments and Due Dates

We are starting the Unsolicited Proposal this week. It is due May 30.

By Wednesday, complete step 1 of Discussion 4. By Friday, complete step 2.

Week 7 (May 10 – 14)

Videos and Readings

Videos

  • Weekly overview: LINK
  • Rhetoric overview: LINK

The videos below are from last year. I started to re-record things for this year, and I realized that I was just repeating myself. I don’t like to re-use old stuff like this, but it’s the best I can do at the moment! I recommend either reading the Aristotle chunk or viewing the videos.

  • Book 2, pts. 2-3, Anger/Calmness: LINK
  • Book 2, pt. 4, Friendship/Enmity: LINK
  • Book 2, pts. 5-6, Fear/Confidence, Shame/Shamelessness (Pride): LINK
  • Book 2, pt. 7, Kindness/Unkindness: LINK
  • Book 2, pt. 8, Pity: LINK
  • Book 2, pts. 9-11, Envy, Emulation and Indignation: LINK
  • Book 2, pts. 12-14, Audience Types: LINK

Aristotle, Rhetoric. Please just read Book II (pages 38-77): LINK. If you need a cheat sheet for the dispositions, try this one.

And, here’s that Maximum Fun letter:

max fun letter example

Assignments and Due Dates

By Wednesday, complete step 1 of Discussion 5. By Friday, complete step 2.

Week 8 (May 17 – 21)

Videos and Readings

Week 8 Overview: LINK

Discussion Board Overview: LINK

Goering Video: LINK

Elizabeth Goering’s “Framing Matters: Communicating Relationships through Metaphor in Fundraising Texts,” from Discourse in the Professions: LINK

Assignments and Due Dates

By Wednesday, complete step 1 of Discussion 6. By Friday, complete step 2.

Week 9 (May 24 – 28)

Videos and Readings

Overview video here.

No additional readings this week.

Assignments and Due Dates

By Wednesday, please post a rough draft of your Unsolicited Proposal to the Unsolicited Proposal Peer Review discussion board. By Friday, please review two peers (the person who posted above you and the person who posted below you).

By Sunday, please submit your Unsolicited Proposal to the assignment page on Canvas.

Week 10 (May 31 – June 4)

Videos and Readings

Week 10 video link

Assignments and Due Dates

If you complete some revisions by Wednesday, please post your materials to the Final Project discussion board. Follow our normal peer review procedure (reviewing the person above you and below you) by Friday to get 1 point of extra credit per review.

Finals Week

Your final project materials are all due by Wednesday night. (I’ll start grading on Thursday.)

css.php